Philosophy

Aristotle s The administration : The Nature of the Polis Man is by dis present a political sentient existence - AristotleLaws of NatureIn his work The Politics , Aristotle makes both(prenominal)(prenominal) argu handsts soakedt to explain , praise , or criticize the prevailing br a nonher(prenominal)ly organises of his m . In the low book of the Politics , Aristotle makes compositiony arguments with regards to the polis and its mingled comp hotshotnts . For the sake of this , however , we will focus on 4 main points : 1 ) that gentle homosexual is a socio-political animal(prenominal) , 2 ) that the polis is a political union that completelyows its citizens to partake of the grave bearing sequence , 3 ) that the rule of the master all over the slave is incisivelyify , and 4 ) that the rule of the save ove r the wife is by temper edThe first book of The Politics provides us a lot of Aristotle s philosophical method . Aristotle operated from the assumption that the hu gaysity is a able arrangement , with each portion of the entire work outing a necessary function in keeping overall . To take apart an existing structure , unrivaled must first research into its origins , and then into its particular(prenominal) characteristics . Then , using drive , one will be able to determine for what purpose whateverthing existsMan as the Political Animalthither is no denying that adult male is a social animal no one person to stand up a estimable flavour without the participation of new(prenominal)s . A corollary to this is that every social animal is necessarily a political animal as hearty both form of interaction that we have with opposites is in instal a political eventMan , because it is the only(prenominal) animal gifted with sharp-witted speech , is the only entity able to communicate truth , nicety , and ! scarceness to his fellows . As Aristotle saysNature does nonhing in vain and spell alone among the animals has speech . patois serves to reveal the advantageous and the denigratory , and hence also the save and the foulThere is , of course , a reason why men rear end communicate such(prenominal) things , and it is to piece of ground with their fellow military man macrocosms , and therefore enable each new(prenominal) to lively a behavior of goodness . Like his predecessors Plato and Socrates , Aristotle argued wholeheartedly for a life lived in accordance to virtue . In fact , bliss is to be defined as the becoming activity of the head in relation to unchanging , undying virtue . This speech pattern on ` acting the part of the good man sure as shooting echoes of what Socrates taught during his life and up to his deathThe Origins of the PolisAristotle argued that the polis arose from sheer tangible necessity , and is evidently the highest form of human alli ance . There ar three primary trains of such partnerships : 1 ) the sign , which is a partnership between a man , a woman , and their children , 2 ) the village , which is a partnership of legion(predicate) households , and 3 ) the polis , which is a partnership of many villages . The polis will lastly arise as the free completion of the first devil partnershipsThe polis arises essentially because of a primary reason : the desire of men to live a good life . It was Aristotle s contention that man tail only live such a life in the polis , where his physical penurys argon provided for and he cig bette engage himself in other pursuits , such as ism and politics . According to Aristotle , only beasts and gods do non need a polisIn addition to its other go , the polis allows a man to gratify his need for social interaction . As previously mentioned , man is a socio-political animal , and can non lick his complete creation when in isolation . Thus Aristotle can claim that time coming into being for the sake of sust! enance , the polis exists for the sake of living easyOn SlaveryThe discussion astir(predicate) thralldom is one of the approximately arguable of Aristotle s works . In this portion of The Politics , Aristotle posits that some mint ar slaves by nature . The criterion for a natural slave is the escape of reason . Comparing slaves to other items of situation , he goes on to say that slaves are to be categorize as `animate property while play , tools , and such are `inanimate propertyAristotle , in accordance to the terminal of his time , did not seem to look at in inherent human rights or dignity . Also in accordance with the culture of quaint Athens , he did not regard all men as free and equalise Like the ancient Chinese , he endured that everyone remote his admit countrified were barbarians . Thus , most barbarians - if not all of them - were slaves by nature , and could be justifiably subjugatedThere is one care to Aristotle s thinking about slavery , and i t is that some volume , who are not slaves by nature , can hold out slaves in fact - commonly due to military defeat and mastery . Aristotle categorically declares that this theatrical role of slavery is unjustOn the Status of WomenAnother disputed issue in the The Politics is Aristotle s vagary of women . In mingled passing plays Aristotle states that the fe manlike is subscript to the male , and that the leave of the save over the wife is naturally ed . only , the honest inwardness of his writings on this is lighten unreadable - some commentators view it as a typically discriminatory text , other commentators see a hang of primordial feminism After all , Aristotle does draw a decline between the status of women and slaves . While slaves are govern by their masters in a `kingly bearing meaning the rule of the superior over the modest , he avers that women are rule in a `political , which implies a level of equality between the sexes . In another passage he s tates that women have the roll faculty , hardly sim! ply deprivation the authorityThe Politics : Interpretation and ArgumentsThe author believes that Aristotle makes excellent arguments when it comes to man s nature as a social animal , as salutary as with regards to the origin of the polis . That man is a socio-political being is amply demonstrated in the way most hoi polloi live their lives , and can be validated by any unmarried . As for the polis , it must follow that it arises from smaller organizations , just as modern nation-states are composed of a assorted and multitudinous group of smaller organizations . Indeed many of Aristotle s statements of the city-state can noneffervescent be applied to modern nation-states , except for the conception of the elevated citizen which is untenable considering the size of modern statesAs for the argument on slavery , it is clear that Aristotle made some bad assumptions . The first was to assume that there are people who are naturally fitted to become slaves . The second was to ass ume that everyone needs to be ruled , and that those who escape the rationality to rule themselves should be ruled by others . much(prenominal) assumptions are at odds with current views on human rights and self-determinismAristotle s declaration that the slavery of those who are not natural slaves is unjust can be interpreted as being selfish .

He is saying that the enslavement of Greeks is unconscionable - nevertheless that enslaving non-Greeks is just , for the most part . Also , he seems to believe that it is people like him - i .e , those have highly develop deliberative faculties - who least deserve slavery . It is the author s own position that no one shoul! d be enslaved , regardless of b escape foodstuff , gender , or physical and mental characteristicsThe author disperse undecided on Aristotle s views on women . While it is the author s positive belief that women , taken in inferior to men , he regards a husband s rule over his wife as proper and desirable , albeit with several caveats . First , while a husband is to exercise leadership over his wife and family , he must not be a tyrant and impair his power . Second , if a woman is bound to run certain duties for her husband , then it should follow that the husband should be bound to perform certain duties for his wife as healthy . Lastly , women should be respected and allowed to live life on their own terms , albeit within the bounds of marriageBibliographyAristotle . The Works of Aristotle . Translated into position by W .D . Ross et al . Oxford , Clarendon Press , 1921Plato . The Dialogues of Plato . New York : picayune Books , 1986The Bible . New International Versi on . Tyndale House Publishers , 1991In the moral philosophy , Aristotle argues that the ultimate good of man should naturally flow from acting his function well . Therefore the good for a man (happiness ) turns out to be an activity of the soul according to virtueIn Plato s Dialogues , specifically the Apology , Socrates declared that A man who is good for anything ought not to calculate the chance of living or dying he ought only to consider whether in doing anything he is doing right or wrong - acting the part of the good man or of a bad .for wherever a man s organize is , whether the place which he has chosen , or that in which he has been placed by a commander , there he ought to remain in the hour of danger he should not think of death or of anything that of disgraceA natural slave is one who participates in reason only to the extent of perceiving it , but does not have itAristotle , who would later become tutor to black lovage the Great , taught him as much . Alexande r , when he had already gone on to Persia and seen it! s culture , would later write to Aristotle and quietly reprove him of such a narrow viewThis view is not unique to Aristotle . Most cultures and religious traditions (including Judaism , Christianity and Islam ) have long ascribed to women inferior rights and privileges . Aristotle s views on women are the rule , not the exception , in humanity s long historyIn contrast slaves did not have the upset faculty at all , and they obviously had no authorityThere are few exceptions to the rule that men love to interact with other men . Hermits and ascetics often choose to live in isolation , but this does not necessarily indicate a lack of social needs - just the denial of themIn Genesis 3 :16b , Jehovah declares to Eve that your desire will be for your husband , and he will rule over you In 1Corintians 11 :10 Paul argues that neither was man created for woman , but woman for man While the author adheres to such Judeo-Christian beliefs , he does not take such beliefs to the extreme . What worked in ancient Judea might not work for us at present . Women are essentially equal to men rilievo arrangements such as the husband s rule are mean to facilitate a well-ed family life , not suggest an variety in statusPAGEPAGE 4 ...If you want to get a bountiful essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay